BIG NEWS -- Feb 2026
We just received a spectrophotometer and a dissolved oxygen probe, and will have better tools to figure out the exact amounts of chemicals, including nitrates and nitrites!!!
We just received a spectrophotometer and a dissolved oxygen probe, and will have better tools to figure out the exact amounts of chemicals, including nitrates and nitrites!!!
work below is in process!
SAVE THE FRASER RIVER
We all love the Fraser River. It's a frequent sight for many of us. But how are we showing our love for the river?
We understand that civilization causes an impact on the natural world around it. We don't have to look much further than climate change to see this. But in practice, in our day-to-day lives, the river seems fine; people are fishing in it, so there is still fish. If there was a problem, some politician or regulatory person would have done something about it, right? RIGHT?
So, how can we measure the impact of humans on the river?
Let's get up close and personal with chemistry!
We understand that civilization causes an impact on the natural world around it. We don't have to look much further than climate change to see this. But in practice, in our day-to-day lives, the river seems fine; people are fishing in it, so there is still fish. If there was a problem, some politician or regulatory person would have done something about it, right? RIGHT?
So, how can we measure the impact of humans on the river?
Let's get up close and personal with chemistry!
Photos from our third trip -- results pending!
Our Results
1. Fraser River, Quay Area - Nov 4th, 2025
We tested the water by the Fraser Discovery Centre, using a water collector we designed, that can be lowered into the river. We did the process of washing everything that touches the sample three times. We noticed that, despite the day being beautiful and sunny, there was a smell on the river; some students smelled rotten egg, some smelled petroleum. It was a bit windy, and so we could smell everything. I for sure could smell the petroleum. The water was greyish green, dark and seemed opaque; the water depth meter reached 76 centimetres before disappearing. There was some foam, some debris and some scum, and a dead fish. The water felt sticky to the hands when we tested it.
- Air temperature: 16 degrees
- Water temperature: 14 degrees
- Conductivity: 90
- Chlorine: 0.5
- PH: 7.2
- Alkalinity: 40 mg/L
- Hardness: 150
- Dissolved Oxygen: 11
- Salinity: 0.53
- Nitrate Nitrogen: 25
- Nitrite Nitrogen: 1
2. Pitt River, Poco Trail - Nov 16, 2025
We tested the water of the Poco trail area, on the upriver side of the Pitt River bridge. We noticed right away that there was a difference on the look and smell of the river. The water seemed very clear. There was no smell at all, no foam, no film, despite being a rainy day, and the water of the river looked to be flowing backwards. The water clarity was improved, about 1.20 meters. The water felt crisp and clean to the hands, like from a faucet.
- Air temperature: 13 degrees
- Water temperature: 11.5 degrees
- Conductivity: 65
- Chlorine: 0
- PH: 6.8
- Alkalinity: 20 mg/L
- Hardness: 200
- Dissolved Oxygen: 11
- Salinity: 0.38
- Nitrates: 0
- Nitrites: 0 (close to)
Analysis
The conductivity showed a 38.5% increase at the Quay location. Still, this level of conductivity is considered low for rivers. However, the comparison for the two locations paints a clear picture. A river that originates in snowcapped mountains usually does get minerals from the earth as it passes by; the amount of 65 is considered healthy for a river. The increase of the same river in such a short distance shows that there is a reason for this increase. This is often seen during pollution events, such as sewage discharge.
The chlorine results of 0 on the Pitt River show a healthy river with an ideal amount of chlorine to ensure the health of aquatic life. On the Quay, the consistent result of 0.5 ppm may seem small, but it is actually extremely harmful to aquatic life. Chlorine is not supposed to be found in a river at all. A level of 0.5 ppm is ideal for drinking water as it helps kill microorganisms -- good in your faucet, NOT in a river. The ideal amount for a healthy river is 0.0005 ppm -- so, the Fraser River at the Quay has 1000 times over the acceptable limit for a healthy river. This is seen in areas with heavy industrial discharge.
There wasn't much change in the PH of the two locations, but the location at Pitt River was slightly more acidic.
The alkalinity of the two locations is exceedingly low; this means that there aren't a lot of carbonates and bicarbonates, which help stabilize a river's Ph levels. This means that the Fraser River is very sensitive to changes in acidity as it has no way to balance it; the Fraser River is therefore very exposed to possible acidification, which may happen as the level of CO2 increases due to fossil fuel emissions.
The rivers have water that is considered moderately hard to hard. This comes from calcium and magnesium, as the river flows through limestone and chalk stones. A level of 150 to 200 will possibly cause a white residue on dishes and dry skin. For the aquatic life, this is not an issue, and many species of fish thrive in this level of hardness, such as salmon.
Both locations show excellent oxygenation levels.
The salinity levels of the Quay area are consistent to being closer to the ocean, while the salinity is lower at the Pitt River location. We might have had an issue with the salinity meter, so the data may be innacurate; however, it still shows that the salinity is higher at the Quay location.
The most surprising results were the nitrates and nitrites.
We will be retesting these results as maybe something went wrong. Results between Nitrate and Nitrate Nitrogen were mixed, and so -- things could be worse than they seem. If the results are of Nitrate Nitrogen, then we're in much more trouble, as this means we would be at 110 Nitrate levels.
Nitrate levels on a river are supposed to be zero, or close to it; this is the case of the Pitt River location we tested. High nitrate levels such as the Quay area are found near agricultural, sewage discharge and urban runoffs, so they are very much caused by human activity. Our water at the Quay, according to our results, show as 2.5 times the limit for drinking water for humans. For aquatic life, these levels may be tolerable by adult fish for a short period of time, but if the exposure is long term, this can be very harmful. The fish can become ill and lose their immunity, which will impact their reproduction and cause them to get diseases very easily. It is particularly harmful for the eggs and young fish fry. Moreover, these levels can cause an overgrowth of algae and underwater plants, which in turn are decomposed by bacteria; as the bacteria processes the algae, it consumes the oxygen, suffocating fish and other aquatic life.
Nitrites are also caused by human activity. They are supposed to be zero. A result of 1 ppm, as seen at the Quay, is considered extremely high and must be dealt with immediately, by eliminating the industrial runnoff or the failing sewage systems. Any detectable level is stressful and harmful to fish. The Nitrite level at the Pitt River location, while not zero, barely changed the colour of the strip.
Regarding fecal coliform bacteria (harmful bacteria/E-Coli), the New Westminster location tested extremely high for bacteria (based on speed of culture development, colour and smell), while the Pitt River had no bacteria even after two and a half days of culture in a warm location.
The chlorine results of 0 on the Pitt River show a healthy river with an ideal amount of chlorine to ensure the health of aquatic life. On the Quay, the consistent result of 0.5 ppm may seem small, but it is actually extremely harmful to aquatic life. Chlorine is not supposed to be found in a river at all. A level of 0.5 ppm is ideal for drinking water as it helps kill microorganisms -- good in your faucet, NOT in a river. The ideal amount for a healthy river is 0.0005 ppm -- so, the Fraser River at the Quay has 1000 times over the acceptable limit for a healthy river. This is seen in areas with heavy industrial discharge.
There wasn't much change in the PH of the two locations, but the location at Pitt River was slightly more acidic.
The alkalinity of the two locations is exceedingly low; this means that there aren't a lot of carbonates and bicarbonates, which help stabilize a river's Ph levels. This means that the Fraser River is very sensitive to changes in acidity as it has no way to balance it; the Fraser River is therefore very exposed to possible acidification, which may happen as the level of CO2 increases due to fossil fuel emissions.
The rivers have water that is considered moderately hard to hard. This comes from calcium and magnesium, as the river flows through limestone and chalk stones. A level of 150 to 200 will possibly cause a white residue on dishes and dry skin. For the aquatic life, this is not an issue, and many species of fish thrive in this level of hardness, such as salmon.
Both locations show excellent oxygenation levels.
The salinity levels of the Quay area are consistent to being closer to the ocean, while the salinity is lower at the Pitt River location. We might have had an issue with the salinity meter, so the data may be innacurate; however, it still shows that the salinity is higher at the Quay location.
The most surprising results were the nitrates and nitrites.
We will be retesting these results as maybe something went wrong. Results between Nitrate and Nitrate Nitrogen were mixed, and so -- things could be worse than they seem. If the results are of Nitrate Nitrogen, then we're in much more trouble, as this means we would be at 110 Nitrate levels.
Nitrate levels on a river are supposed to be zero, or close to it; this is the case of the Pitt River location we tested. High nitrate levels such as the Quay area are found near agricultural, sewage discharge and urban runoffs, so they are very much caused by human activity. Our water at the Quay, according to our results, show as 2.5 times the limit for drinking water for humans. For aquatic life, these levels may be tolerable by adult fish for a short period of time, but if the exposure is long term, this can be very harmful. The fish can become ill and lose their immunity, which will impact their reproduction and cause them to get diseases very easily. It is particularly harmful for the eggs and young fish fry. Moreover, these levels can cause an overgrowth of algae and underwater plants, which in turn are decomposed by bacteria; as the bacteria processes the algae, it consumes the oxygen, suffocating fish and other aquatic life.
Nitrites are also caused by human activity. They are supposed to be zero. A result of 1 ppm, as seen at the Quay, is considered extremely high and must be dealt with immediately, by eliminating the industrial runnoff or the failing sewage systems. Any detectable level is stressful and harmful to fish. The Nitrite level at the Pitt River location, while not zero, barely changed the colour of the strip.
Regarding fecal coliform bacteria (harmful bacteria/E-Coli), the New Westminster location tested extremely high for bacteria (based on speed of culture development, colour and smell), while the Pitt River had no bacteria even after two and a half days of culture in a warm location.
The Goal
With the gathered information, we would like to write the people responsible and share our findings.
List to contact:
- B.C. Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy
- B.C. Conservation Officer Service (COS)
-
Important allies:
https://www.sfu.ca/science/news/2025-news/health-of-fraser-river-delta-requires-monitoring--management--sf.html
List to contact:
- B.C. Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy
- B.C. Conservation Officer Service (COS)
-
Important allies:
https://www.sfu.ca/science/news/2025-news/health-of-fraser-river-delta-requires-monitoring--management--sf.html
BUT why test the waters?
WATER! We use it every day. We drink it, we bathe in it, we wash our hands every time we go to the bathroom (RIGHT?). But do we ever wonder what is hidden in it?
Some of you may have heard of microplastics. Scientists discovered that microscopic particles of plastics can be found in most bodies of water. We also know some water tastes bad when you drink. And (hopefully) we remember that water is also made of two atoms of Hydrogen and one atom of Oxygen (H2O). We normally don't think about where it comes from, or what is in it besides H2O. All water we come in contact with has more than this molecule (with the exception of precisely distilled water). All of these are chemicals, including H2O!
But some chemicals are harmful when you drink them. What's more, many chemicals cause conditions in the waters of rivers and oceans that make life very difficult, and sometimes impossible.
Around the world, species become extinct due to pollution coming from many different sources. Industrial runnoff, sewage, trash, oil and other environmental dangers are frequently dumped in rivers around the world. This is what happened to the Yangtze river in China, for instance. The Yangtze is the third longest river in the world, and it is known for being extremely polluted.
Some of you may have heard of microplastics. Scientists discovered that microscopic particles of plastics can be found in most bodies of water. We also know some water tastes bad when you drink. And (hopefully) we remember that water is also made of two atoms of Hydrogen and one atom of Oxygen (H2O). We normally don't think about where it comes from, or what is in it besides H2O. All water we come in contact with has more than this molecule (with the exception of precisely distilled water). All of these are chemicals, including H2O!
But some chemicals are harmful when you drink them. What's more, many chemicals cause conditions in the waters of rivers and oceans that make life very difficult, and sometimes impossible.
Around the world, species become extinct due to pollution coming from many different sources. Industrial runnoff, sewage, trash, oil and other environmental dangers are frequently dumped in rivers around the world. This is what happened to the Yangtze river in China, for instance. The Yangtze is the third longest river in the world, and it is known for being extremely polluted.
But we don't have to go across the ocean to find nature in trouble. Chemicals are being dumped into our rivers, right here, in New Westminster. This should be a warning for everyone who lives near rivers and has seen orcas, eagle and hawk in BC; maybe even a bear or two. These animals are also endangered, not just because of climate change, but because of pollution destroying their food sources.
A good example of this is our orca population. B.C. has a well-tracked population of resident Orcas, who rely almost exclusively on salmon for survival. In recent years, there has been a decrease in the orca population of some pods. If the river is not healthy, this breaks the natural balance and everything falls together in succession.
And chemicals are only part of the problem. Like we mentioned before, climate change also plays a HUGE part in the health of a river. The temperature of different bodies of water around the world has changed in recent years. This could have catastrophic consequences for wildlife, such as slowing down ocean currents and making some areas uninhabitable by some species of fish. Drought can also cause entire populations of salmon to die as they try to spawn in the rivers they were born. The recent heat dome event of 2021 is estimated to have killed over a billion animals which were simply cooked to death in BC.
And chemicals are only part of the problem. Like we mentioned before, climate change also plays a HUGE part in the health of a river. The temperature of different bodies of water around the world has changed in recent years. This could have catastrophic consequences for wildlife, such as slowing down ocean currents and making some areas uninhabitable by some species of fish. Drought can also cause entire populations of salmon to die as they try to spawn in the rivers they were born. The recent heat dome event of 2021 is estimated to have killed over a billion animals which were simply cooked to death in BC.
